Quote from: bible_pay on October 16, 2017, 07:00:57 PM

Quote from: inblue on October 16, 2017, 06:57:25 PM

Quote from: bible_pay on October 16, 2017, 06:53:07 PM

Quote from: inblue on October 16, 2017, 06:46:29 PM

Quote from: nsummy on October 16, 2017, 06:35:46 PM

Quote from: oliwer21 on October 16, 2017, 05:51:49 PM

is that normal?
https://imgur.com/a/Ai648

and can anyone tell me what is today with HPS2? Rising and going down for all users...
Now it looks like multicore function on pool is disabled and few hours ago was on;)

That looks normal to me. You can point multiple daemons at a user. HPS will only show up for the first daemon, and hps2 will reflect the total for all of the daemons.

Yeah but is it normal that the shares number doesn't correspond to HPS2? Compare shares and HPS2 from the first two rows in that screenshot.

I raised the diff on the pool for everyone about 30% because it was getting pounded with too many hits per second and that seemed to alleviate the trouble it was having keeping up with updating the solution lag per second.

I believe the screen capture was taken while it was updating the leaderboard.

Right now there are about 10 users (inblue included) where shares solved per IP per round are very high. I havent done anything about it yet as everything looks OK, but I just wanted to mention that if people dont bring other pools online, it could be suggested that maybe we add a rule to limit the number of shares solved per public IP. Why? Because the mining is for everyone. There really is nothing I can do if you want to rent a lot of hashpower over multiple IPs, but something doesnt feel quite right with all the solutions per second over concentrated IPs.

Well it's because the results are better when multiple daemons/nodes are running on the same machine, rather than just one. It was you who suggested this possibility after all, and then we saw better results, so yeah. I would much rather like if I could run just one daemon and get the same results, it would be much easier for me.

I'm not here to give you 1000% of other users money! It was me?

Are you saying your script yields 10* the results vs a standalone miner?

I'll go ahead and shut your accounts down until we figure this out then, is that cool?

I don't get it, what did I say wrong? Or what am I doing wrong?

Um, I don't think you understand the concept of mining pools. My computers find blocks for which other pool miners get their share of the reward! And because of my computers, blocks are found more often by the pool! Having big miners can only benefit a pool!!!

But feel free to play an admin in a decentralized project, shut down my account if you want, I don't care. I think I have helped immensely in this project, but I am always getting bashed by you. I think it's time to say goodbye.