The important thing to remember, a lot of the whitepaper in this time has made without trying to determine the structure of the whitepaper itself, and especially the content is not suitable in my opinion.
For the more explanation about the whitepaper and why don't you just try to visit the google and try to search them all, You must know this not the correct place to learn about the whitepaper.
But if you are not know how to made a good whitepaper and why will you want to run ico I meant another future shit token or money grabber.
This means you don't have any knowledge about that.
investopedia and wikipedia seem to provide very good material for you to learn how to build whitepaper.
For the more explanation about the whitepaper and why don't you just try to visit the google and try to search them all, You must know this not the correct place to learn about the whitepaper.
But if you are not know how to made a good whitepaper and why will you want to run ico I meant another future shit token or money grabber.
This means you don't have any knowledge about that.
investopedia and wikipedia seem to provide very good material for you to learn how to build whitepaper.
Why so aggresive?
I'm just asking about people's opinion about what they want to have or miss in a whitepaper.
There is a lot of crypto whitepapers out there and a lot of stupid articles and blogs about how to write them.
Asking the community as one source (and not the only one) of information is a part of research.
This means you don't have any knowledge about that.
And people are born with that kind of knowledge or they read and ask to learn it?
I'm reading and asking to learn as much as I can about the topic. Thanks for being helpful.
In fairness to @shinratensei_, he is not aggressive dude, we just hate people come here and asking questions that obviously they can answered it if they just used their better judgement. There's also a search button if I'm not mistaken. And we don't have to spoon feed everyone. Just do your own research and I think you should be fine.
I think there's no universal format, but as what other have said, just stay to the point and explain what makes your coin unique and different from all the existing coins in the market. And don't go too technical because most of us here are not. Just used 'layman's term' so that we can fully understand about the coin and the direction of the project.