I spotted a hard-to-identify copycat poster called zollyharvan who seems to translate posts back-and-forth in an attempt not to be detected. I noticed after he repeated one of my posts I wrote with my (now hacked) de_xt account on the same thread, making little sense. A quick review of his post history reveals he has been doing the same for some time now.

My original post:

Quote from: de_xt on September 30, 2017, 08:10:56 PM

For those who didn't notice, finally Bech32 address format (the native format for SegWit addresses) has been merged into bitcoin core.

What this means is that from now on it is possible to generate and use native segwit addresses from within core. Using these addresses have a number of advantages. To number some, they have error correction and hinting built-in, are optimized to be human readable, and using them takes less bytes on the blockchain (thus lowering fees even more) when compared with segwit P2SH wrapped addresses (those starting with 3...).

Wallet support for Bech32 is non-existent right now. But this is a step further in the right direction.

https://www.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/739pjb/bech32_address_format_merged_into_bitcoin_core/

Copied post (using slightly different words but with same sense):

Quote from: zollyharvan on October 01, 2017, 08:05:59 AM

those who are unaware that the Bech32 address format (the original format for the SegWit address) have been merged into the bitcoin center
this probably means to generate and use the original address segwit from within its core. Using this address has a number of advantages. For some numbers, they have sound errors and built-in instructions, optimized for easy reading,
bit bytes on the blockchain (so that the price is cheaper) when compared with segments of P2SH which is shrouded in address (which starts de
Wallet for Bech32 does not exist at this time. But this is a step further in the right direction.

Another example from other thread:

Original:

Quote from: Almat on October 13, 2017, 09:17:50 AM

We can't discount the possibility of forks happening, but I doubt any will be called Bitcoin Silver. The name implies that it's inferior to Bitcoin Gold, so people looking to diversify would consider Bitcoin Gold instead. There's also Litecoins, which are basically Bitcoin Silver.

Copied:

Quote from: zollyharvan on October 21, 2017, 02:58:00 AM

We can not underestimate the possibility of a fork, but I do not believe it will be called Bitcoin Silver. The name implies that it's lower than Bitcoin Gold, so people who want to do an examination of the truth of the report will consider Bitcoin Gold instead.

My 2 cents.