Quote from: Javvy on October 21, 2017, 11:15:22 PM

Quote from: danBitcoin on October 21, 2017, 10:38:12 PM

Quote from: Javvy on October 20, 2017, 06:56:03 PM

Quote from: danBitcoin on October 20, 2017, 06:37:40 PM

Are the advisors being paid with your tokens?

Yes, but some advisors (not all are listed) are also being compensated with CASH as well, as they are more involved in the day-to-day decision making process than most ICO advisors. So, those who perform a specific function are compensated for their time immediately and also have a vested interest in the success of the project by dropping their normal rates in exchange for tokens.

What's the reasoning with not listing some advisors?

Hi Dan. Good question. I sort of eluded to this in an earlier reply, but here's a more detailed overview...

We hired several advisors who were very qualified freelancers. The goal is to get to know them and see if they are fit to become a full part of the team or not. While some advisors have given great feedback, we do not want to clutter our site/info with a lot of advisors that may not be brought on long-term. Unlike most ICOs, we want our advisors to be truly engaged and bring strength to achieve success for the project.

Some early advisors were not brought on long-term, despite giving good feedback, because they were simply unreliable or difficult to coordinate with for meetings, feedback, and decisions. Ultimately, we only highlight those we feel contribute to the overall goals of this project and who dedicate the time to truly help it succeed.

Totally makes sense. No reason to completely align your product with everyone you get advice from.