Quote from: chryspano on October 22, 2017, 08:05:50 PM

Quote from: CoinEmperor on October 22, 2017, 07:52:28 PM

Quote from: Revelations86 on October 22, 2017, 05:47:40 PM

As the title states, I have contributed ETH for EOS during multiple contribution periods and have 2 questions:

   1) My understanding is that I do not need to claim EOS tokens to my ETH address for me to get the allocation when the EOS blockchain goes live in June 2018.
   The only requirement is that I register an EOS public address to my ETH address. Is this correct?

   2) How can I view how much total EOS (which I have not claimed yet) is allocated to me using the contract function?

Does anyone know the answer to this?

Try the official telegram https://t.me/EOSproject

Afair from the last time I tried to use Telegram, forcing us to install a mobile app and give up a mobile #. The web signup (pertaining to a different altcoin project) did not seem to sufficient by itself when I tried it from my location a few weeks ago.

In this case, please do not claim words I did not write nor intentions I did not intend. I did not say for sure what is the case. I explained what happened to me in a similar situation.

Quote from: smooth on October 22, 2017, 07:22:39 PM

Quote from: Hyperme.sh on October 22, 2017, 02:31:00 PM

1000s of users who afaik supply the vast majority of the data for the Steem blockchain were not transacting because the shit was down. I do not understand why that is so difficult for people to appreciate.

I don't disagree on that point, as I said it was an important application (or part of the "system" if you want to call it that) that was down.

Quote

Again it was apparently not the websites which were non-functional as the web pages were loading. Yet it was the data from the ledger which was not being served. Now you claim these servers/nodes which supply the data from the blockchain to these sites is not part of the blockchain. That is your definition. There is no conspicuous official documentation I have ever seen which makes all of these definitions you are claiming to be the official ones. Heck there is not even a proper whitepaper for the DPoS blockchain. It is not even clear if there is any funding and economic model for these nodes/servers which are suppose to provide the data from the blockchain to the front-end sites.

You are right on this point and it relates to EOS (and competitors such Ethereum) as well in the sense that no one has really explained how these so-called dapps are supposed to work, how they are hosted, etc. IMO this is largely because the capital driving it all does not really care about all that beyond the minimum necessary to sell some sizzle and just wants to trade tokens. Vague claims about 'world computer' and '100k tps' (hasn't Dan been selling that same line since BTS where it was just as meaningless and has not and never will be delivered?) are enough to do that.

@smooth thank you for your fair and logical reply.

I should also acknowledge that my original comments could have been construed to mean by some people that every facet of the system was down especially the concept of a blockchain as distinct from the ecosystem built around the potential forward progress of the ledger (regardless of whether most of the ecosystem could not send a transaction) and the nodes which are relied upon to serve the historic data, and thus you were correct to correct me on that point. I stand corrected and I admit I was wrong to give such a broad scope impression to those who interpreted my words as such. In my haste, I admit I failed to be as circumspect as I could have been in properly articulating myself to avoid angst and incorrect interpretations. And I admit that those who have railed against me are probably correct that I had some intention in my mind to draw a bad light on this fundraising effort (for the various reasons I had mentioned), so it is quite understandable that they would dig into me about this issue.

John has finally decided to open a dialogue and is pointing to this comment I made (extracted from a lengthy list of issues I raised):

Quote from: Hyperme.sh on October 06, 2017, 03:18:14 PM

Steemits DPoS was offline for over an hour before I slept. And when I awoke it has still been down several hours later. The DPoS centralized ledger design is not robust enough to scale out to the world. It works for some small shit like Steemit sometimes.

Again I believe he is reading what he wants to read and not my intention. I am clearly linking there to:

http://archive.is/http://www.isitdownrightnow.com/steemit.com.html

Obviously that is not a link to any full node proof or claim that the block producing nodes are still up (even though that link does give a good indication that most of the forward progress of the blockchain would be stalled and thus down).

The context of that post was I was making general criticisms of DPoS and for example another criticism which has come forth is that the design of DPoS apparently does not fund these servers/nodes which have to supply the data from the history of the blockchain. To me, that is part of the blockchain, because it influences whether there will be (significant) forward progress of the blockchain because most of the users depend on it (as currently implemented afaik but no documentation for me to be sure unless I dig around in source code and such).

Quote from: Hyperme.sh on October 22, 2017, 02:31:00 PM

Quote from: John Titor on October 22, 2017, 01:41:44 PM

Don't care, you are delusional

Quote from: private discussions

I am not sure about anything w.r.t. to the world view. But I can not refute the PhD & scholars compelling evidence that Mossad did 9/11 and the corruption in WW2 to create the Zionist state. Doesnt mean I believe in UFOs, reptilians, and other disinformation from non-scholars.

[]

People believe what they want to believe. Sheep like to ignore opportunities to separate from the herd and prefer to feel safe in the herd even when they are being harvested.

I have vacillated over the past 16 years on the global elite conspiracy theme. I became burned out on it for several years and was tired of listening to nutcases rail on and on about chemtrails, reptilians, etc.. But then recently I decided to watch some videos produced by PhDs and scholars about the evidence and arguments that Mossad did 9/11. And frankly, I can not refute that very compelling exposition.

Do you really believe that 9/11 was done by some Arabs who could not fly airplanes well in flight school who boarded the planes with box cutters (yet our government refuses to release the full length of the surveillance videos same as in the recent Las Vegas massacre). What is your explanation of this event ^{(other than to just ignore it and focus on the ass of the sheep in front of you)}?

I have an inquisitive mind.

I am interested in understanding the Zionists as it may pertain to what type of monetary systems, laws, and regulations we are headed into, so that my altcoin project has taken this into account as much as possible. Its actually a very responsible action I am undertaking.

The reason this is so important is because who ever controls the one-world reserve currency can basically turn the world into slaves via debt similar to what is happening to Greece now and what will happen to the entire world soon due to the short dollar vortex underway:

https://gist.github.com/shelby3/c192cedaed52ef11ef97acb239dc5986#euro-is-a-monetary-enslavement-paradigm

Quote from: Gleb Gamow on October 22, 2017, 06:45:12 PM

Translated: There are some real sick puppies on this forum. Roll Eyes

And wet cats also:

Quote from: chryspano on October 21, 2017, 07:58:57 PM

You would be surprised to know how many people behave like wet cats when the authorities knock on their door, or when their "wish" is granted. So, be carefull not to cross the thin red line.

Asked the mod to delete the content-free post above and my response but nothing happened.

Quote from: chryspano on October 22, 2017, 07:40:36 PM

And whose fault is that for amplifying the attention in this thread on me. Roll Eyes

Dont complain if you build your house next to an active volcano, then later have lava in the living room.

Hopefully this is my last post in this thread.

Quote from: chryspano on October 23, 2017, 08:56:17 AM

Indeed, and I believe that leaking private/personal conversations says a lot about someone's character, no matter how the mods react on this matter.

Trolls who falsely accuse others in public (thus resorting to guerrilla warfare tactics) should not be surprised when someone demands theyre culpable and that the issue is brought to light in public to clear the innocent persons reputation.

Youre clearly resorting to similar tactics which thus demonstrates what a slime ball you are as well. Which is to be expected given your affiliation with Dan and his obfuscation money grabbing schemes.

You will reap what you sow. Continue flaunting the securities laws and such.

Quote from: chryspano on October 23, 2017, 08:56:17 AM

I don't know what other proof someone needs that you can't be trusted for anything.

Since I am not planning any $300+ million pre-functional token sale money grabs, nobody needs to trust me for anything. The entire point of decentralized ledgers is they should be trustless and permissionless, but your leader seems to not think so, since DPoS is permissioned and requires trusting the whales.

Quote from: http://www.foxnews.com/us/2017/10/23/wrongful-conviction-no-surprise-to-kansas-black-community.html

WICHITA, Kan. Rose McIntyre says she wonders whether her refusal to grant regular sexual favors to a white detective prompted him to retaliate against her black son, who spent 23 years in a Kansas prison for a double murder he didn't commit.

Rose McIntyre recounted in her affidavit that Golubski coerced her into a sexual act in his office in the late 1980s and then harassed her for weeks, often calling her two or three times a day, before she moved and changed her phone number.

"He had total power, and I was terrified that he would try to force me again to provide sexual favors," she said in the affidavit. "I also knew that there was no one I could complain to, as Golubski was known to be very powerful in the community and in the police department."

Golubski was so involved with black female prostitutes and drug addicts that he fathered children with some of them, according to an affidavit from retired police officer Ruby Ellington, a 25-year Kansas City police department employee.

The above is an example why trusting anyone or group with authority is dangerous.

Quote from: chryspano on October 23, 2017, 08:56:17 AM

Btw EOS warchest is filled with much more than $200.000.000, is growing by an aditional 1 million per day and has more than 13 devs working right now

There is no amount of money or resources that can give you the advantage, because since I first started trying to convince him in 2013 not to do so, your leader has never learned to remove collectivism and and inherent centralization from his ~~designs~~[Rube Goldberg obfuscation schemes].

Quote from: Hyperme.sh on October 21, 2017, 12:48:45 PM

Oh but he grabbed the money to help starving Africans!

And left all his other projects. So we should really trust him with all our money and all our efforts and careers.

Quote from: Hyperme.sh on October 21, 2017, 12:48:45 PM

Once again you are ~~trying to be~~ at the center of attention.

ftfy.

Im at the center of attention because Im writing important information. Because Im an expert. And I do not need to convince you. The facts speak for themselves. The readers arent all as stupid as you and Dan apparently think they are.

The ultimate outcome will determine who has bragging rights. Were still in the early innings of this contest.