Quote from: Destroyer1333 on October 23, 2017, 04:24:54 PM

Quote from: acer on October 23, 2017, 03:45:27 PM

Quote from: karmakeddon on October 23, 2017, 02:28:47 PM

Well guess what? This business just lost a lot of potential investors because of the fiasco that happened. They do not even apologize for their mistakes. I received my tokens, but with how they handle business, I have lost faith in this project. The management they have is horrible, customer service is horrible. I feel bad for people who invested a lot in this platform as they will lose their hard earned money. Too bad, Authorship really had potential due to its real world use.

That's close to what I'm saying before! They lost a lot of potential readers, writers and investors too. But this problem could be solved if they "cancel their silent mode" and pay to everybody who did not get their tokens... whenever they are legit or cheaters... While the price of ATS is low it will be cost-effective to their business. It is easy to solve that problem now! People will not stop calling them "scammers" till they pay to everybody. It is great price now to do it!

They paid to everybody. There was only 1% without payment in the beginning but they Paid everybody later.

Please stop spreading wrong info.

There are 5,000 token holders with 75/80/85 tokens as it can be seen from the etherscan token tracker.

Your shilling is getting annoying.
You are either bad at maths or a stone cold liar so you can get a little bit of profit out of this token.

The top 10 referrers alone had over 4000 referrals.

When you add up the accounts with high amounts of tokens (bounty, not talking about the 1900 investor addresses) you can do a good estimate how many 'little ones' with 75-300 tokens must exist.

The bounty program was basically a pyramid scheme, so there are WAY more bottom feeders than accounts with a lot of tokens. Currently, as you say yourself, it is approx. 1:1 (even less accounts with few tokens, more with many), which is mathematically nonsensical.

They paid out less than one third, way less actually.

Side effect if you do the math: you find out that they did not stop the bounty program when the allocated number of tokens was reached.

They intentionally let people still join, already knowing that they would invent fake criteria to label them as 'cheaters' and only pay a fraction of the participants (top down because they expected the little guys to be silent - big mistake).

Anyone defending this fuck-up is either blind, deaf, or corrupt.

Maybe all of it.