And all that for what? So you can avoid confronting the truth that there's no such thing as "true freedom"?
Hahahaha!

The only meaning of freedom I'm willing to accept is one that does not need to mention the forces that cancel it, a meaning that stands alone. A positive meaning that explains what it is as opposed to what it isn't.
Wow, that's going to be a tough one. I guess that might be touching upon the realm of metaphysics where the
subjective experience of freedom would be a
quale. Even though you might feel/sense/taste it, you could never really explain it to anyone -- successful explanations would just be an illusion, like successfully explaining what 'red' is to an alien. Even if the alien says "ah, yes, now I understand what red is", it's still just guesswork that
your 'red' doesn't look green/blue/purple to them.
What I was getting at earlier was that all this 'freedom' talk is like comparing the floor area or "niceness" of a
prison built within a prison. Even if the prisoners break the walls down, they're still all stuck in a bigger prison! (Whether it's Pitcairn Island, or planet Earth...) It seems that some people really,
really want to avoid facing this fact and insist on some holy grail of
true freedom.

If you can take a step back and laugh at the absurdity of it all, then I guess that would make you a lot freer than some people.
+1 Ideas like true will and eudamodia are vastly more helpful than ideas like the NYPD.