Quote from: dishku on November 01, 2017, 07:01:26 PM

There are some some competitors already in the market would you like to share the comparison chart what are advantages to use this platform and how users will get maximum benefits in future. This is nice idea and there big room of growth so it will be more interesting platform in future.

Hi there. A common question asked is how we stack up against Filecoin, Storj etc. This blog post answers that.

https://blog.bluzelle.com/how-is-bluzelle-different-from-ipfs-filecoin-storj-sia-and-ethereums-swarm-1d1d792658f8

Another comparison is to BigChainDB.

BigChainDB's current product is a technology where you either have to get your own nodes and run your own network that is built around MongoDB, but decentralized. This is fine if you want to manage your own nodes and have your own IT and is a far cry from anything that is ready to go and requires the developer to be actively involved in managing their own DB nodes and all upkeep. Quite different from Bluzelle. BigChainDB also has IPDB, which is a more "world database instance" kind of database. It does not appear to have any sort of swarming or crypto-economic model that guarantees decentralization and instead relies on "caretakers, which are organizations that agree to share the responsibility of managing the network. Very different from the mass-decentralization model of Bluzelle that scales on the fly and accepts farmers at will to act as resource-providers for the network, incentivized by the cryptotoken.

We are looking at OPE (order-preserving encryption) to do searches and range queries. Basically, and simply, OPE keeps the relative order of A, B, and C, so that the ciphertexts for A, B, and C are still in the same relative order. There are some challenges around this that we are working hard on.

You can do distributed searching this way despite the data being kept private, which is obviously very desirable.