Quote from: MISS_nSTASSY on November 06, 2017, 09:24:28 AM

Okay, I'll try to specify my vision

Quote from: HmmMAA on November 05, 2017, 04:21:40 PM

The technology will not be held by the team , it will be distributed across a network that will get paid for the work commited.

Lets imagine a big company ("B.C." in our case) that started to use third-party service N to make some computations some years ago. In 2018 B.C. found out about elastic, decentralized supercomputer that can held the same computations but more cheaper than service N, and B.C. can save 10 million $ using Elastic platform annually. And that is great.
But if B.C. decided to work only with elastic and base all of computation on this platform, B.C. becomes vulnerable and dependent on elastic devs. And from now anonymous elastic devs have leverage of influence on B.C.. Will B.C. use such platform risking one's status only for economy, not such a big amount of money for them?
And another nuance is confidentiality of computing information supplied by B.C. to Elastic platform.
B.C. can sign a contract with N, and will be protected by laws of their state. But who is responsible in collaboration between B.C. and Elastic if anything happens?

And there is the only thing that I can't understand in this project

All another aspects and details of this project makes a great impression on me and makes me respect the devs with their attitude to the development

Bc wouldnt depend on elastic developers, but on the software and the entire community, which could mean the company is depending on 10000 individuals instead of 1 company, the odds are better for 10000 individuals, they wont all of a sudden agree to stop helping (they probably cant even choose themselves which company they help)
The confidentiality is the huge advantage of open sourced blockchain, its automatically clear how confidential the information is handled.