Quote from: LuckyXIII on June 08, 2013, 02:36:26 PM

Quote from: edd on June 08, 2013, 02:34:06 PM

Quote from: LuckyXIII on June 08, 2013, 02:32:33 PM

Quote from: teukon on June 08, 2013, 02:17:00 AM

I've never quite understood the natural objection to lost coins that some people seem to have. Many other perceived problems with Bitcoin are explained but this one is usually taken as axiomatic.

Is it the lost granularity that concerns people? Is it a fear that people will hoard bitcoins? (Economic flamewar aside, I don't see why hoarders would be less likely to lose coins than everyone else).

Perhaps it's just because existing currencies are not so fragile. I don't see a gold forum parallel to bitcointalk.org with topics like "Help! I accidentally launched 3.8 tonnes of gold into deep space."

The problem as I understand it is that there is a finite number of Bitcoins that will be mined, 21 Million. After that any coins that are hoarded and forgot about or destroyed by damaged media, are out of circulation, forever. This will lead to the number of BTC shinking over time.

This is correct but it's not really a "problem."

I suppose it depends on the rate of Bitcoins being destroyed. I can't imagine a shrinking number of coins in cirulation won't have any effect at all on their value.

Man. Just think before you type. There are 100,000,000 Satoshis for each Bitcoin. Do the math instead of babbling. And please, after you have done the math, be so kind to let me know what rate of coin destruction we need to have for this being a problem in, let's say, 2200.