Quote from: tomkat on November 06, 2017, 04:35:53 PM

What do you mean with "unauthorized and authorized global failure of the platform"?

In other words - authorized - is the fault or error, caused by somebody(by a person to be precise), and unauthorized - error caused by network failure(without any human factor involved).

Quote from: Evil-Knievel on November 06, 2017, 03:07:53 PM

Sorry, but I think that I still don't understand what you're trying to find out

What I understood is that you would prefer that the devs disclosed their identities so companies can hold them liable for whatever goes wrong. If I understand this correctly, then I think a centralized project might be the better fit in this case.

Decentralized blockchain-based "use at own risk" applications are - by design - usually built in a way that neither a central authority is present nor is there any need to "trust" someone. So, if you do not need to trust anyone, then why do you need a public record of the devs and their full identities? In my eyes, you don't!

Yes, you answered my question Grin

So elastic is a platform that can make all kinds of computations, based on decentralized technology which exclude the aspect of trust and guarantees the confidentiality of information. It took me a long time to get to the truth Grin

I hope the potential clients of platform will get to it faster than me

Anyway, thanks for your answers and I am grateful to you for taking the time to discuss these matters with me