Quote from: lotto56 on November 08, 2017, 07:30:53 AM

Quote from: DroidR17A on November 08, 2017, 06:24:59 AM

This is definitely a disappointing development. The AML team could do the right thing and give early adopters bonus tokens to compensate for the inconvenience. Hopefully that's all it will be "an inconvenience" and not a bate and switch.

I DON'T THINK IT'S A BATE AND SWITCH BECAUSE OF THE DEEP GOVERNMENTS INVOLVEMENT (HOWEVER ONE CANNOT BE ABSOLUTELY SURE ) I JUST DON'T THINK IT WAS ROLLED OUT PROPERLY, A LOT OF FLIP FLOPPING HOWEVER I THINK THEY MIGHT CRAM PHASE 2 AND 3 INTO PHASE 1 WHICH WOULD CHIME WITH WHAT WAS SAID ON THE FIRST PAGE OF THE FORUM 2 MONTHS PROMOTING THEIR ICO AND 4 - 6 MONTHS TRADING THE AML TOKEN ON THE EXCHANGES.

If this was truly holding to government policy, wound't it fall under the SEC ruling? I've invested, but I'm concerned about it falling into a very grey area. I'm really hoping it's legit, as I'd rather not have thrown my money away, but we'll just have to wait and see at this point.

AML devs, any words to help clarify what's going on?