Quote from: ElPedras on November 10, 2017, 03:37:32 PM

Please send me a link to the rule that I broke to deserve the negative trust.

I really have to see I didn't respect that rule, because if I did, I promise you I will not say anything again. But if that rule exists then it has to be another rule about the usage of signature, then you'll have to give me 2 links, first with the rule that I have broke by having the signature, and the rule that this signature is yours, and no one is allowed to use it.

I tend to repeat myself, but if I messed up any of these rules I'm really sorry, and I will do what is necessary to modify the signature.

If there is no such rules and you just invent them as you go, because it's in your interest, and you have the power, and no one can do anything about it, then... it's like I said before: this is a abusive action from Lauda, and I the OPs should see that this is a invention and remove my negative trust.

OPs you are here to make sure that everyone respects the rules of this forum. PLEASE show me the rule that I'm not allowed to have this signature, and show me all the other signatures that I'm not allowed to have.

Thanks

I have explained everything on my post above, and I dont give you negative trust. Look, you have stated yourself:

Quote from: ElPedras on November 10, 2017, 11:30:51 AM

Now this a example so you could understand how things work in the real world, if you own color ferrari red which is: #ff2800 and if I want to use #ff2800 I have to ask you for permission, and if you say no I won't use it but if I have color #ff2802 that is no more ferrari red, it's another color that you don't own. That's how pattern work in real life.

You know that if you want to use other people's work, then you have to ask for permission, thats how things work in the real world right? And now, this guy doesnt do that. So you basically just ask me to show which rule that supports your own words?