Quote from: Pab on November 12, 2017, 03:56:42 AM

Quote from: dmwardjr on November 12, 2017, 01:21:44 AM

Quote from: Pruden on November 12, 2017, 01:17:12 AM

Quote from: dmwardjr on November 11, 2017, 11:17:40 PM

WHEN Luc Kindly asks me to leave

You still depend on mom telling you when you're making a fool of yourself?

You still depend on mom to tell you to do the right thing of not following the bully or bully crowd even when someone is being a "productive member" to a group? As far as I'm concerned, you and others like you can shove it. I will continue to be "productive" until Luc Kindly asks me to leave and/or he changes the title to indicate this is only for "his" analysis and no one else is allowed to post a chart [Which several of you have done I might add]. Why is it not okay for me to post? Never mind that question. You've already made clear your bully intentions.

I'm staying and doing absolutely nothing wrong by staying. I've broken no rules in this thread. Hell, no "rules" have been published on the first post of this thread stating any such rule for only Luc to post charts and ideas but no one else.

Your hypocrisy [And those of your bully friends] serve none of you well and I will continue my updates out of spite until and/or otherwise Luc Kindly asks me to leave and/or changes the title of this thread to indicate only he can post a freaking chart and share thoughts or ideas.

Thanks for sharing

And thank you for your support. I honestly believe Luc wouldn't have it any other way than for all of us to share. I can see if what was shared was not "productive." At least I'm willing to lay it on the line and say what I believe is about to play out based off "patterns" I saw in FIB RT 0.618 Price Points when the coordinates of those FIB's are placed at pre-determined locations as described with a couple of rules from "Loaded Gun Theory," which have shown a "consistency;" a "pattern." I personally, believe the time and effort invested to see these consistencies and patterns was "productive."

That's what I brought to the discussion and "thought" it was worth having a look. This is "somewhat" consistent with Wyckoff's Schematics but brought to a more modern (crypto) evolution. Many have thought [When looking at his schematics] that we "must" have a Phase E in Distribution Schematics while ignoring important rules he laid out before getting involved with the schematics.

Anyhow, thanks for your support! And again, I'm sure Luc would agree. I'm sure he would want us all to share thoughts and ideas. Come on guys and girls?

As for somewhere else to share and where people can appreciate my work (time & effort invested) to put together some publications; I already have that place with over 780 followers. https://www.tradingview.com/u/ProwdClown/

I like coming to this thread because I got inspiration from Luc to invest time to become a better trader and "hopefully" have enough knowledge to "contribute" positively to the group some day. Now that "some day" has arrived and I invested time for that "some day" [Since June 2014], I'm told, "Go away, this is only for such and such." Well, I'm not having it!!! If Luc {One of my inspirations; although he doesn't know it} were to kindly ask me to leave; not post charts or something to that affect OR change the title to "Luc's Analysis," then fine, I'll chill and take my analysis elsewhere. Otherwise, I will remain and "contribute."