You haven't taken enough time to review what you say objectively. Rather, you turn your ideas into religion for yourself, so that you can believe the things you want, rather than finding the truth objectively.

Cool

How many of these bullshit responses do you have lol, just admit I beat you, my arguments destroyed yours. No need to cry, be a man and admit it.

It's not a point of "beating" or "winning." The point is that of finding the truth.

Treating science theory as fact when it is not known to be fact is not truth. Everything you have pointed out scientifically against the existence of God, and against the science law that proves God, is science theory. It isn't known to be factual, even if it is factual.

Science law is what is known to be factual. Science law is what proves the existence of God.

Cool

You see, my argument is against the way you use the laws to prove god, the laws themselves do not talk about god or the creator of the universe, even if they are factual. You state a few laws and then deduce/assume god existence with them, my argument shows why your deduction/assumption is wrong. So it doesn't matter whether the laws you use are factual or not.

No. I show how the laws cannot exist together in a universe like ours without God. There is no assumption.

The thing you constantly do is assume that I am assuming. You do it because you don't take the time to calculate the proof for God out.

Cool

You try to show that but you are wrong as pointed out in my posts that you refute to answer to because, well, because you can't really, you know you can't, that's why you don't.

Your refutations are assumptions or assumption based. Cool

You keep saying that but you never point them out, it makes you look like a fool.