Quote from: crypt0r3x on November 13, 2017, 04:43:02 PM

Quote from: zositarik on November 13, 2017, 02:45:13 PM

Quote from: realhellomoto on November 13, 2017, 01:36:28 AM

Take a developer fee for marketing and infrastructure of 500 BTCZ per block size reward, but do not destroy the factor 1000 in relation to BTC.
The halving will destroy the trust of 'normal' people in BTCZ as true BTC 2.0 as explained in post #1 of this thread.

Please could you explain exactly from the advantage site why halving helps?
BTC is mining until year 2040 to get all the 21 mio coins available. Shall BTCZ miners mining until year 2070 to get all available coins?
Halving destroys the reasonable factor 1000 to factor 500, this makes no sense IMHO.

Halving is a contradiction to the basic concept of BTCZ.

-swisstrader

Quote from: trung12ly on November 12, 2017, 05:35:36 PM

Quote from: ipnet on November 12, 2017, 03:55:55 PM

What is the advantage of BTCZ to Zcash?

Zcash devs take 20% (2.5 Zec out of each block) while BTCZ is a pure coin,

BTCZ starting to get a dev fee you too

This is not a dev fee - this is a community chest. Dev fees go directly as 'wages' for the work they do/ have done.

The proposal here is to build a community chest where a part of the block reward goes to a multisignature wallet address where there are 8 key holders.

Any funds that need to be withdrawn from the chest MUST be voted on and if vote passes 3 of the 8 key holders must sign the transaction for it to execute.

This is the proposal - please voice your position here, if you haven't already: https://goo.gl/forms/ePzHWJ4New7HoNls1

If investors want to see this coin really get off the ground they should acknowledge that some funding is required to achieve something. Who will be part of the signer group? Has that already been decided?