Quote from: Inspector_Cypto on November 13, 2017, 07:51:20 PM

Quote from: BTCMILLIONAIRE on November 13, 2017, 07:30:28 PM

Quote from: Inspector_Cypto on November 13, 2017, 07:08:18 PM

Come on man. Why don't you just sell the rest of your MCO? Just move on if this is how you feel.
If you invested during ICO you'll have made a lot of money already.
Everyone has heard what you had to repeat page over page... It's getting a bit old.
I really feel like you don't deserve what's to come nor a card with that attitude.

"With that attitude?"

Are you joking? We got baited with promises that were just thrown out of the window.

As an investor it would be stupid of me to stay invested in MCO now that the fundamentals have drastically changed.

And for as long as people keep spamming pointless shill comments that bring no relevant information to the table I'll keep refreshing the harsh reality of facts.

If the asset contract gets addressed everything will be just fine, but for as long as it hasn't it would be outright stupid and dishonest to look away and let this bait and switch slide.

If this was about profits I wouldn't even waste my time here by the way.

I hear you man. We all have. You're entitled to have your opinion and express it. But at this point you're borderline trolling. Same comments over and over and over. People have given up responding to you.

Kris already addressed the asset contract and said they're looking into a replacement. How about a bit of patience and wait to hear what he offers and then comment again.

Taking that into consideration in addition to the token lock up strategy with expansion and territorial roll out I'm sure you're well aware of the Maths and how it is indeed a very lucrative investment. Feel free to quote my comment in due time but I think you're already aware of this.

I am not trolling.
I am making sure that all the shills don't drown out the reality of a non-existant asset contract.

And I don't know why you accuse me of making the same comments over and over when you make the same pointless argument over and over.

It doesn't matter that tokens get locked up because that was the plan to begin with in addition to the asset contract.

And the asset contract is the main driver of the token's value, whether or not traders want to understand this is completely irrelevant and doesn't change reality.

Kris only stated that he'll look into it, but until he proposes a viable solution I will keep bringing this up. I know for fact that many people actually want to read this info because they were completely unaware of it (keep getting tons of PMs). I also understand that traders don't want to see this in the thread because it makes trading for them more difficult. But I don't give a shit about profits when they come at the expense of false promises, so I'll make sure that everybody hears this until it's resolved.