Quote from: Randoldude on November 16, 2017, 07:40:55 AM

Quote

Why do I doubt this?

You won't, when i will reveal my original account. I really Respect you.

Is that a real "when I will" or did you make a mistake and intended an "if i"? If not, when will you reveal this?

Quote from: Randoldude on November 16, 2017, 07:40:55 AM

Well that's what i don't want. I may in future move into a campaign which is managed by them. So i don't want to shut my doors.

If you're a good poster, there's always room for you somewhere else. However, I wouldn't expect a good campaign manager to deny entry to a good poster just because said poster criticized them (given that the criticism is objectively valid(!) and not some butthurt nonsense).

Quote from: Randoldude on November 16, 2017, 07:40:55 AM

Now Reply Honestly Lauda, If a person is caught in a shady behavior, where its clear that they were after gaining trust, Should they be red painted or not? it's that simple. I will leave this issue alone if you respond to this.

These things aren't bipolar, i.e. they aren't just either shady or not shady. They get increasingly complex and have multiple categories as soon as you add more variables, e.g. malicious or not. Therefore, that needs a bit more context, but the general answer is "yes".

Quote from: Randoldude on November 16, 2017, 07:40:55 AM

Also i am not blaming you for not red painting them. its just that these users have did something which they should have not. I would like to hear your opinion on why they aren't getting red painted?

You aren't properly categorizing behavior. You claim that they were trust farming, right? However, you can categorize such behavior as:
1) Blatantly trying to buy trust. An example of this would be users that made posts stating they'd pay others for trust.
2) Admitted to buying or attempting to buy trust after suspicions were raised (or similar) without a post as described above.
3) People that might or might have not done that (but have not admitted to such nor is there any post which would confirm said behavior), but some people think/feel they they have done that/are trying to do that.
4) Other.

IMO we are dealing with the 3rd case here. While you may be inclined to believe that, I am inclined to believe others. Generally I'm really doubtful of people, especially those that I've had next to no interactions with. My interactions with aTriz and Aventhe so far were brief and all of them very recent. I do not believe that: a) They are alts (as some have previous claimed). b) Their intention was to farm up trust. In case of doubt, the best that you can do here is just keep a closer eye on them.