Quote from: Lauda on November 16, 2017, 09:01:33 AM

Quote from: Doc Martin on November 16, 2017, 08:56:01 AM

Given that you have bid on and offered to buy accounts in the past

I have not.

This is a lie. The proof that you bid on and offered to buy accounts is irrefutable. Proof quoted below to make that clear.

If address posting + wallet linkage is not sufficient evidence of alt connections, none of the connections listed in the OP are proven, and you are therefore "a liar" for listing them there (by your standards)...........

Quote from: gobsmacker on November 14, 2017, 08:29:21 AM

Accounts connected: Lauda, Xanis

Lauda nuked the Xanis account in July 2015. It previously had almost 3000 posts.

https://www.walletexplorer.com/wallet/0159d14a67570b3d/addresses
Lauda: 1LaudaexFYZano87acDNGscmqDbM3ZTLBD (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=996318.msg10896717#msg10896717 / http://archive.is/XzVUk)
Xanis: 1Mx8vNWQKrZpWjYQFa6uMbNeHskPCsyaQR (https://bitcointa.lk/threads/cloudbet-signature-campaign-up-to-0-1-btc-per-month-for-50-posts.314489/page-14#post-7131942 / http://archive.is/tikrd / https://github.com/mikispag/bitiodine/blob/master/deploy/classifier/Lists/bitcointalk.csv)

cd40260d5a57d13eb5d2a4582ef036346f2a66ff948f7ba4ef981795bd64b3ef
^^ 19zYTT7QoCqURn5oZw8VMMSo4tbpERUB4i signs with 1Mx8vNWQKrZpWjYQFa6uMbNeHskPCsyaQR (1LaudaexFYZano87acDNGscmqDbM3ZTLBD as change address)

3a5f78995c9b93c6192d93fabc4bf0534e27a9b781d42626330d0b6cce41a6d7
^^ 19zYTT7QoCqURn5oZw8VMMSo4tbpERUB4i signs with 1LaudaexFYZano87acDNGscmqDbM3ZTLBD -- provably links Lauda to 1Mx8vNWQKrZpWjYQFa6uMbNeHskPCsyaQR (Xanis)

As I said, Lauda nuked the alt account. But the Xanis address was archived on bitcointa.lk (https://bitcointa.lk/threads/cloudbet-signature-campaign-up-to-0-1-btc-per-month-for-50-posts.314489/page-14#post-7131942). It was also archived by a Bitcointalk address scraper on Github (https://github.com/mikispag/bitiodine/blob/master/deploy/classifier/Lists/bitcointalk.csv). A cursory glance through the addresses archived by the scraper shows that they are quite accurate. Pick a few at random and see for yourself.

Miscellaneous notes:

Lauda/Xanis buying forum accounts:

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=320328.msg3435067#msg3435067
http://archive.is/2TBKt
https://i.imgur.com/EBcWS4c.jpg

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=292662.msg3334977#msg3334977
http://archive.is/qFolm
https://i.imgur.com/Ge0WOAr.jpg

But why would Lauda be buying forum accounts? The answer is obvious:

https://bitcointa.lk/threads/primedice-highest-paid-signature-earn-up-to-2-4-btc-month-by-posting.168569/page-465#post-7616384
http://archive.is/4D76m
https://i.imgur.com/OzC84Hy.jpg

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=216854.msg3005096#msg3005096
http://archive.is/zcn2G
https://i.imgur.com/lCiJZda.jpg

"Signature managers against spam?" Oh, the irony!

There is a non-zero chance that Lauda has used (and continues to use) his Default Trust status to facilitate these account trading and signature spamming practices.

The fact that Lauda has been outed as an account trader while simultaneously heading up the SMAS initiative and being a signature campaign manager himself raises questions about a conflict of interest. In any case, please see the feedback Lauda has left for other users. Specifically, Lauda has extensively tagged users with negative trust with the following feedback: "Account sales encourage scams, spam, and account farming." I agree, and by Lauda's own standards, Lauda is clearly untrustworthy for engaging in these practices.

I don't have the time or energy to look further into this now, but Xanis had thousands of posts in the Altcoin sections. I believe that both accounts were being used to scam giveaways. I've recently archived giveaway entry posts made by Lauda (those which haven't been deleted yet) for further research. Unfortunately, as Xanis was nuked, we only have quotes and archives like bitcointa.lk to work from. C'est la vie.