Quote from: WindMaster on June 14, 2013, 09:47:49 AM

Quote from: ASIC SKY Sebastian on June 10, 2013, 04:32:14 PM

Maybe this is not a ASIC in the sence that we placed every single transistor on our own but we assembled something that is definitely specialized on scrypt mining with useable success, so this can't be called a FGPA either.

Basic VLSI and ASIC knowledge test failed. To pull off a successful scam of this type, you first need to learn what ASIC means, then go back and re-read your first post. First post clearly demonstrates a lack of knowledge in the relevant field. You're bordering on not knowing what an FPGA is either. Spend some time on Wikipedia reading the ASIC and FPGA articles before posting the next scam attempt.

This is actually a less proficient scam fail than even the scrypt FPGA investment solicitation by Nova! a few weeks back. Check the first post, then skip ahead to the start of the 3rd page where I called BS and the OP started digging himself into a hole real quick until his scam finally melted down:

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=215487.0

Wow
This needs to be stickied!

Quote from: Nova! on May 26, 2013, 01:11:07 AM

If I have completely misunderstood hashing over a lifetime of programming, then I really have some long hard thinking to do.

Quote from: Nova!

Oh wait, RND meant 'round' and not 'random'?