Quote from: AnonyMint on June 15, 2013, 02:50:59 AM

Quote from: aaaxn on June 14, 2013, 07:24:18 PM

But what about these issues with missing TB?
What happens when SH from 1 to K signs TB, but SH K+1 releases his claiming previous K TBs did not arrive on time? And what if this (K+1)th TB contains transactions conflicting with ones in previous K blocks?
Blockchain does not have any data that would allow nodes to tell 'real' course of action and it would always resolve to some kind of voting between SHs?

This is a very good point.

Yes proof-of-consensus falls apart from many different vectors, because everyone can lie about propagation.

My two points in this thread have been:

1. Lack of non-preimagable entropy (because some peer is always last, instead of competing to be first with proof-of-work)
2. Lack of consensus on propagation

Sorry guys, you can waste time if you want.

1. you seemed to have wasted a lot of time for something that you seem to think you are sure of , which means you are not sure of it at all - and you just conceded that "up thread" .

2. eMuni does basically let the network determine the random order - so you probably need to be Johnny on the spot to attack it if/when it releases, they just conducted a Beta test.

i could only invite that because , what is the point of a system running along with a flaw, if you believe it to be there -