Quote from: IG0BR0KE on June 15, 2013, 08:33:57 PM

Quote from: KS on June 15, 2013, 08:20:31 PM

Quote from: IG0BR0KE on June 15, 2013, 07:50:01 PM

Quote from: KS on June 15, 2013, 07:39:32 PM

Quote from: sarc on June 15, 2013, 07:24:36 PM

Quote from: Miz4r on June 15, 2013, 07:18:24 PM

Instead of evidence you people really should talk about probabilities or indications instead. Evidence is a way too strong word to use when trying to predict the behaviour of a market.

Evidence can give an indication of what will happen, sometimes with a probability attached.

edit: I don't mean TA is not useful but you have to be real quick to react when a whale or other manipulator decides to play and messes up your nice TA.

whales are buying at specific time, that's why we use TA... (im not including manipulators)

That feels like an abuse of the acronym. Do you use TA to predict when they will buy, or to predict what/how much they will buy etc?

i think it's impossible to predict how much they will buy

, dont rly like "predict" i prefer to anticipate when they could buy. they're not silly most of the time they're buying on massive resistance like the most of us.

TA isn't everything we have to keep an eye on news ect.. but i cant understand how people can trade without TA

I would venture those usually end up in the loosing side of the zero sum game, go away, and then are replaced by others.

I've studied TA some 20 years ago, going through some refreshers, but RIGHT NOW, I wouldn't trade BTC. I would buy more if I had the fiat in an exchange, as an investment, but I need to study the patterns better before trading. It's going too fast