Quote from: MiCoSa on November 24, 2017, 05:09:18 PM

Quote from: aaronsace on November 24, 2017, 05:05:55 PM

Quote from: MiCoSa on November 24, 2017, 04:56:21 PM

Quote from: miningpoolhub on November 24, 2017, 04:33:38 AM

Quote from: MiCoSa on November 22, 2017, 10:00:46 PM

I wonder if the auto switch for the baikal giant x10 works correctly? It seems that it switches often to digibyte-Skein not considering, that the hashrate for Skein algorithm is only 5 GH/s instead of 10 GH/s.

Could you please check this?

Hashrate doesn't matter. It switches according to profitability!

Well, the profitability is given in BTC/GH/day, right? If i have a device that can do for algo A 10 GH/s and for algo B it can 5 GH/s. Now lets say the profitability for algo A is 0.5 BTC/GH/day, that means my device makes 10*0.5 = 5 BTC per day. If the profitability for algo B is now 0.75 BTC/GH/day (so profitability is higher then for algo A) my device will only make 5*0.75 = 3.75 BTC per day, because of the lower hashrate. So even when the profitability for algo B is higher, my device should mine algo A. And if you have an extra setting for that specific device, it should consider that different hashrates of the device. Otherwise the Autoswitch for the Baikal Gianr X10 would be useless, as it would often mine for Skein, although it would be better mining myriad-groestl or qubit.

Or is there a mistake anywhere in my thoughts?

MiningPoolHub keeps the hashrate comparisons up-to-date manually.

Thats what i thought. But it seems, there is an mistake in the settings for the Giant X10, because it is often switching to Skein, when it has the highest BTC/GH/day profit, although it would be better, to mine myriad-groestl or Qubit, because of the higher hashrate for these algorithms.

If it switches to Skein then it is the highest BTC/Day (not BTC/GH/Day) on MiningPoolHub's test machine(s). Sure he can check his figures though later to make sure it's correct.