Quote from: striker7334 2.0 on November 24, 2017, 08:30:33 PM

Quote from: gigabyted on November 24, 2017, 08:04:14 PM

Quote from: gawlea on November 24, 2017, 06:41:10 PM

Quote from: gigabyted on November 22, 2017, 12:49:48 AM

Quote from: tinchopf on November 20, 2017, 02:41:35 AM

Quote from: Unwise_Investor on November 19, 2017, 11:04:36 PM

Been following this coin for a little while and the community seems to be fairly positive and growing steadily.
I'm still on the fence about investing though until I can see a more precise roadmap (Upcoming features and timelines) apart from what's listed on the website.
Other than the 0 premine, what really sets this apart from Eth?

You can view the differences here, and take your own conclussions http://ellaism.org/comparison/

Quote from: JungleOnion on November 20, 2017, 01:46:40 AM

will ella switch to pos at some point?

It's not in the roadmap as far as i know

They forgot to post one important aspect thou, Ella is the only coin that main dev isn't public. This is important for trust issues...

Why is this so important? I think you are mistaking, there are a lot of coins with anonymous dev. In the end, this is the purpoe of all cryptos..

Purpose of crypto isn't relying on trusting unknown people. Crypto's goal is to removing the necessity of trusting intermediary people and to go thrust-less with a global consensus. But at the end you still need to trust the team behind the project (specially for small projects like this one), so i rather trust someone that is public, because if he runs with money or break others people thrust at least a public person won't be able to make it again, so he's also breaking his reputation. While an anon dev could do all that without having to impact his reputation. So i just don't see how a anon dev could be better than a public dev (with the same skills level).

Btw i'm not saying that this anon dev would steal people or break thrust, i just say that a anon dev can do it without too much impact on his side...

Once you make a counter argument that its up the the community to grow the coin without the developer giving away his privacy. Since there is no premine or ICO, the project is completely community driven there is not a lot of reason the dev should have to break anonymity to put the community at ease when the github is right there for peer review by the community.

He can't really run with people's money because there is no ICO. If this project will fail the ELLA dev will lose money more than any other miner/investor.

Also, please tell me who made BTC and I'll tell you who is ELLA dev. Grin