What you said doesn't really refute my point: If the devs wanted to pump, why did they release information of the swap four days earlier than promised? It seems that by giving the information early they actually wanted to stop the price from pumping. You're ignoring this fact completely. You're just speculating and accusing devs of a pump without any proof whatsoever.
10:1 might have been a better swap ratio, however you're forgetting it was the community who chose the 4:1 ratio.
PS. The average Sigt price was never 499 sats after the pump, you can check
https://coinmarketcap.com/currencies/signatum/ yourself. Maybe a single trade was for 499 sats but a single trade doesn't give the full picture.
LOL, who matter about the average price? They just could have done this. I asked for some prove about their sigt wallet, but no one is answer. They stop the pump before too much people understand their intenction and they let sigt run free for almost 2days before the news of the swap details come out. They don't need a big pump, just a bit to call them out. They should prove to us that I'm wrong, so we can think they are just fools and not scammers. Anyway, for sure they are fools with no sense of marketing. Otherwise they would do this in a complete different way. This is innegable.
This is pointless. I gave clear reasons why this does look like an intentional pump by the devs and you choose to ignore them. You have your own agenda and conspiracy theories and nobody can convince you otherwise. Even in the unlikely scenario that a wallet is posted, you can just say it's photoshopped. Good luck with your chosen path.
PS. Check the link, can you find the 499 sats price there?