Quote from: Marco Bignoses on November 27, 2017, 04:44:42 AM

Quote from: Chromexnet on November 27, 2017, 04:29:33 AM

Quote from: Marco Bignoses on November 27, 2017, 03:34:28 AM

Quote from: Chromexnet on November 27, 2017, 01:09:42 AM

What you said doesn't really refute my point: If the devs wanted to pump, why did they release information of the swap four days earlier than promised? It seems that by giving the information early they actually wanted to stop the price from pumping. You're ignoring this fact completely. You're just speculating and accusing devs of a pump without any proof whatsoever.

10:1 might have been a better swap ratio, however you're forgetting it was the community who chose the 4:1 ratio.

PS. The average Sigt price was never 499 sats after the pump, you can check https://coinmarketcap.com/currencies/signatum/ yourself. Maybe a single trade was for 499 sats but a single trade doesn't give the full picture.

LOL, who matter about the average price? They just could have done this. I asked for some prove about their sigt wallet, but no one is answer. They stop the pump before too much people understand their intenction and they let sigt run free for almost 2days before the news of the swap details come out. They don't need a big pump, just a bit to call them out. They should prove to us that I'm wrong, so we can think they are just fools and not scammers. Anyway, for sure they are fools with no sense of marketing. Otherwise they would do this in a complete different way. This is innegable.

This is pointless. I gave clear reasons why this does look like an intentional pump by the devs and you choose to ignore them. You have your own agenda and conspiracy theories and nobody can convince you otherwise. Even in the unlikely scenario that a wallet is posted, you can just say it's photoshopped. Good luck with your chosen path.

PS. Check the link, can you find the 499 sats price there?

Now you says that was an intentional pump? I'm confused.
I have no conspiracy theories, I've just follow the facts from the first days. You're not. I trust them in all the ways before this shit. I'm simply sad about their avoid words about transparency and community coins. Most of sigt holders (now straks future holders) just feel to have no choice, but everyone don't agree with the terms they choose. They just haven't done what they talk about. I repeat, for me is ok also a different swap like 10:1 or more. The point here is another and seems like you don't want to see. The fact that you are not involved in, don't mean that I'm not lucid about the facts. I've just a better kwoledgment about the facts and about the dynamics because I lived any single moment about all this story. And, for the 25th time, also if the don't need a pump, the way that they choose to reveal the news is really fool (and also suspicious). Now a lot of people have no choice. Swallow all or sell everything. But for sure you can't talk about a concept and act in a different way without no one of your community was informated about your intentions.
PS: for example, for prevent the fud, they can also get public their sigt wallet address before all this fud for a full transparency about their movement.

Oops, it's a typo, I meant to say unintentional. Funny how you say I don't follow the facts while you're just speculating without any proof. Care to point out what I said that wasn't a fact?