Quote from: blockonomy on November 28, 2017, 01:49:22 PM

Quote from: captainbluff on November 28, 2017, 12:46:27 PM

Quote from: blockonomy on November 28, 2017, 10:11:19 AM

Quote from: captainbluff on November 28, 2017, 09:15:43 AM

Quote from: verb on November 28, 2017, 08:46:06 AM

node worth pretty high for such a young project, but damn, 18 days ROI!

I disagree, node worth is too low. The lower the price, the more masternodes will be bought, which will lower rewards.

It would sound backward as when the demand for an asset/investment raises - the value always appreciates.
Hence the more masternodes bought, the higher the demand, the higher the price goes, the higher the returns.

Then how do you explain the price of chain coin with it's 2000 + masternodes?

Another example is Innova, used to pay out $100 a day when there were less than 30 masternodes. Now only $35 when there are over 400 masternodes. Vivo another example.

My observation thus far, when the number of masternodes goes up too fast, the price doesn't always follow. This is why price needs to go up first so that so that masternode worth won't be too affordable.

The price not keeping up is not correlated to the growing demand in masternodes (as I could also mention counter examples, famous one as well).

Higher buys/demand for masternodes will not bring the price down however I agree, if the utility-value delivered by a currency does not match the expectations it does not matter how many masternodes, the price will go down.

Dash managed to maintain a high price with a high number of nodes because it delivers an exceptional value with its currency. This is were the focus needs to be basically but the worries are not about the number of masternodes imho.

DASH is the only one I can think of where the price went up as more masternodes were added. The majority of the masternode copies out there do not follow this rule.