Quote from: CyberTrust Co-Founders on November 28, 2017, 03:12:42 PM

Quote from: valley365 on October 25, 2017, 08:23:55 PM

It looks like an effective project. A small amount of tokens is an advantage. In terms of price, I guess it would be difficult to reduce at least. If they can work effectively and attract institutional investors, I think a nice bread from this project will be obtained. If, as mentioned in the Roadmap, it is based on 2014, the work of the team is a very valid project.

The project come to live when Vitalik Buterin agreed with a major bank to do a multimillion $ investment.

after legal, accounting, tax and compliance due diligence teams finished with their review.

Deal DID NOT happen.

they said that risks where way too big for a fiduciary responsible institution to invest into ETH. (at that time ETH was between trading in the range of 7 to 14USD)

So when people say that their is institutional wall of money waiting to enter. This is 100% BS!

Institutional investors can not enter crypto because

1) their accountants go crazy since their is no properly TITLED asset

2) their auditors can not audit it

3) clearing&settlment risk are so high that their chief risk officer gets fired if he approves such deals

4) tax people go crazy as they don't know whats the tax impact and how to optimize it

5) and their regulator goes crazy as they can not regulate it either through judicial or regulatory framework

These real life problems we are working on SOLVING.

First step is securitsiation platform fueled by CABS token

Second step, investment banking decentralized protocol.

Great answer but what with the spam? What happen?
Did you guy do Q&A session?