Quote from: Ryancope123 on November 28, 2017, 06:12:04 PM

Quote from: jmeyer2k on November 28, 2017, 05:29:23 PM

Quote from: s3v3nh4cks on November 28, 2017, 04:48:10 PM

it absolutely was intentional.. Don't start ' It was an accident ' BS.. This may be open-source, but there are still rules

Can you please point it out? Here's a diff of Phore headers vs. PIVX headers. Thanks! I'd like to get this resolved.

https://gist.github.com/meyer9/4b343d1005fea1e8c70d643a33543c83

I realize in the past, Phroshi made the mistake of changing PIVX to Phore in the license instead of adding Phore under PIVX to give both credit. Although this was probably intentional, it was almost certainly not malicious. In addition, it was fixed over 2 months ago in this commit: https://github.com/phoreproject/Phore/commit/e0fc7765fdcf276ee2be9409974bd2c7125c8b58. I don't understand why you are bringing it up now.

I know 100% why it's being bought up.

It's being bought up because Phore is gaining a LOT of attention and people are really starting to get involved and become part of it ( and why not it's a great project and community), this is a poor attempt at trying to cast a negative shadow over everything, and more than likely is coming from somebody in a team such as PARTICL who love slagging other projects it seems !

Yeah...
And the fact that s3v3nh4cks didn't respond to jmeyer2k's clarification seems to prove your point.