Quote from: bitcoin2cash on June 21, 2011, 01:39:10 AM

Quote from: EnterpriseE1701E on June 15, 2011, 09:16:48 PM

Your definition of violence is inadequate, and I think cuomo does the best job of showing why: http://www.jstor.org/stable/3810390

Please either post a link to something that's publicly accessible or put it in your own words. Otherwise, it looks like you're just making an assertion without backing it up. Giving someone a laundry list of authors isn't an acceptable substitute for a rational argument. If you don't believe me then read Dr. Seuss, Hitler and J.K. Rowling, in that order.

why would you not want to read other philosophers if for no other reason but to strengthen your argument and refute them.

Can you find fault with "Act only according to that maxim whereby you can, at the same time, will that it should become a universal law." -IK

Do we first have a perfect duty not to act by maxims that result in logical contradictions when we attempt to universalize them?

Can persons in a State of Nature agree to a social contract defining the rights of that newly formed society?

What is inequity? Inequity of power... Inequity of opportunity.... inequity of biology? Huh

Is justice merely a lack of coercion?

Quote from: Atlas on June 15, 2011, 08:29:04 PM

Alright, agorists, I need some help founding a sovereign agorist company. Through the power of the digital world this seems very feasible if all business is conducted online. Through what kind of agreement should such a company be founded upon? I certainly don't agree with limited liability. Give me some advice and perspective here.

What is this company producing? Can it be whirligigs?