Quote from: CoinCube on November 29, 2017, 08:45:14 PM

I don't and haven't.

Disagree.

It's quite obvious you emphasized a statement about God which was not the theme of the post you referenced:

Quote from: CoinCube on November 29, 2017, 06:26:12 AM

Quote from: CoinCube on November 29, 2017, 06:25:18 AM

Jordan Peterson: The reason modern people cant see God is that they wont look low enough
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=n2py4aBpmko

The boxing in is where you attempt to argue with logic and reason that superrationality is valid, yet I showed whether it is possible relies on faith. So you're essentially implying that those of us who disagree that superrationality is valid, are somehow not ethical and are implicitly less good because we refuse to strive for something above and beyond nature.

Quote from: CoinCube on November 29, 2017, 08:45:14 PM

However, a grave and serious Judgement has be made against me by another. It is an extremely serious charge, serious enough that I am compelled to respond to my accuser.

I remember in the past you tried to accuse me of lying about my predictions successfully made, and then I would quote and cite for you exactly where I had done what I had claimed I had done, then you accused me of editing my posts ex post facto (i.e. you implicitly accused me of being a liar). But the point was you falsely accused me. So now you're in a huff when I call you out for having a confirmation bias as a religious zealot and a leftist/progressive (who tries to claim his is a libertarian), and you're trying to once again misrepresent the facts of what was done and said.

Quote from: CoinCube on November 29, 2017, 08:45:14 PM

Quote from: CornCube on November 22, 2017, 07:06:43 PM

CCs ethics are actually evil.

To to declare someone's ethical framework as evil is about as dire an accusation as one can level. It's a spiritual charge the declaration that their morality is false.

Your misquote above misrepresents what I wrote. I will quote for you exactly what I wrote as follows:

Quote from: CornCube on November 29, 2017, 10:24:15 AM

How would you know why and what others see or cant see w.r.t. an issue of faith. Elevating a personal matter to one of social commentary and judgment, is evil and potentially very dangerous as he points out in his video. I think youre missing the point of his video, which is to look inside to yourself. If you find God there, then fine, but it doesnt mean that his video is about the necessity of finding God and judging those who dont find his God as failing to look inside themselves.

[...]

He captures some of the reasons that I dislike CoinCubes presentation of God.

Stop boxing me in, and presuming your interpretation of a theological question is correct. God is a personal matter because it is always based on faith, not on rationality, logic, or reason. Allow me to do it my closet as Jesus said in Matthew 6:5.

We can box each other in on measurable phenomena. But God will never be measurable in our current understanding of spacetime.

No where in the above quote did I declare you are evil, nor did I declare what your ethics are. I declared a specific action/tactic to be evil. Are you admitting you are doing the action/tactic that I stated is evil? I can't judge you on matters of good and evil (proclaiming a total order or universal truth), as I am only human with knowledge of only a partial order. I stated what I think would be evil because it is impossible for someone to prove their faith with logic and reason, thus it seems to me that should be a private matter in consultation/prayer/meditation with our God.

The reason you're falling into this trap is because you're trying to force reason and logic as justification for faith. That is causing you to push too hard to find confirmation bias in everything. If your faith is truly solid, then you should not need to win arguments of logic and reason about your faith. Faith is a personal and private matter. I warned you about Bruce Charlton, and that he is trying to judge others with logic and reason (which I showed is inapplicable) as if he is a God. Satan throws out these traps for us. But again I can't judge him other than if he is judging others then he will receive what Matthew 7 says, the same judging back on himself.

Quote from: CoinCube on November 29, 2017, 08:45:14 PM

In the face of such an attack it is important to clearly state what the foundations of my ethics are and I am entitled to demand the same of my accuser.

By demanding that I discuss my faith outside of my closet, you would be doing the action/tactic that I (and Jesus) said is evil.

Quote from: CoinCube on November 29, 2017, 08:45:14 PM

We are required to love our neighbor as ourselves even when they are very different at a biological level. This means treating women as you would have wanted to be treated if you had been born female instead of male with all the difference that come with that. It means putting yourself in the place of others and truly acting with a mind to not just your interests but theirs.

Egalitarianism is not very loving. It's destructive.

Quote from: CoinCube on November 29, 2017, 08:45:14 PM

I am of the opinion that Jesus is telling us to be superrational but in a much deeper and fundamental way. Superrationality itself is simply an attempt to formalize that wisdom with only partial success.

I already provided my refutations about superrationality. I think you're suffering from the sort of idealism (lack of grounding in pragmaticism and facts of nature) that leads to megadeath.

Quote from: CoinCube on November 29, 2017, 08:45:14 PM

Yes a female brain will always be different then a male brain. That does not make it worth less just different better at some things and worse at some things.

Define worth in this context? Who wrote they are worth less or worthless? Only you apparently used that word in this thread.

Quote from: CoinCube on November 29, 2017, 08:45:14 PM

All women are still children of God and deserving the respect that comes with that as are all Men.

To respect them we must understand them. Putting them on a pedestal and destroying them (or society if you raise leftist/progressive princesses) by promoting egalitarianism which funds their hypergamy to run amok is not respecting them. As I stated already, I don't believe that females in aggregate can overcome their hindbrain which is baked into the biology of the species. The actions of females can be better understood and explained once their subconscious mind is taken into account. I am confident that the cited psychologist will agree with me after he reads what I wrote and researches the facts. I have no problem with allowing females to be in a meritocracy where they must compete equally. In that case, end all divorce laws, end all affirmative action, end all identity politics/subsidies/distorts of the free market. That means do not force men to pay for the children! Let women compete with their biology as it is, and stop subsidizing them. Stop putting a double-standard on men. If a man does not want to support his offspring, that is his decision to make, not society. Otherwise you're subsidizing hypergamy. You and I will never agree on this.

Quote from: CoinCube on November 29, 2017, 08:45:14 PM

Yes there are very valid issues raised by those who are concerned about the disruption of traditional gender roles and the harmful effects that result from this. These are difficult problems that do not have simple solutions. However, the existence of these problems does not mean we are exempt from higher ethical responsibilities. Our challenge as men is to work towards finding solutions to these problems while simultaneously holding ourselves to a moral code in an era where morality and God is widely ignored and mocked. This no easy task but it is the burden of men to bear it.

End egalitarianism. You can't have it both ways. Complaining about something while continuing to do what causes that something is not a very coherent state-of-mind.