Quote from: eldentyrell on June 22, 2013, 06:44:09 AM

Quote from: eldentyrell on June 22, 2013, 06:28:24 AM

Quote from: 2112 on June 22, 2013, 12:56:43 AM

That information was available since last year.

Quite possible! I can't keep up with the tangled mess of threads this forum has become Case in point, I cannot find Avalon's statement on the hashrate per chip. If you can post a link to that I'll add them.

I found a bunch of random third-party sites tossing around the figure of 282 (MH/s)/chip. If somebody can post a link to someplace where Avalon or one of their employees verifies this, I can finish adding them. Either hashrate per chip or hashrate for a specific product along with the number of chips in the product (which is the other number that's way too hard to find)

At 282 (MH/s)/chip they would be η=2,909 slightly better than bifury but still behind BFL.

I think BFL numbers should be counted with 4GH/s per chip: https://products.butterflylabs.com/homepage-subproducts/65nm-asic-bitcoin-mining-chip.html