Post
Topic
Board Hardware
Re: Process-invariant hardware metric: hash-meters per second
by
2112
on 22/06/2013, 22:20:14 UTC
Anyways, if that's still the case I'd be uneasy about including those numbers… they could be fudged quite a bit at zero risk of getting caught.
I fully understand that you don't want to consider the pre-tape-out numbers for the inclusion in your table. But out of three columns there only one is unknown.

But fudging isn't zero-risk for those who ship their hardware to the end-users. It is only a matter of time until one of the Block Erupters that were sold gets accidentaly damaged and the chip will get decapped.

Check out this thread: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=231400.0 and the recent post of this user: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=23585 . For now it is just a re-confirmation of the Avalon data.