Quote from: Groc on December 01, 2017, 09:06:09 PM

Quote from: spartanrules on December 01, 2017, 08:38:32 PM

Quote from: paretonetwork on December 01, 2017, 08:15:05 PM

Quote from: Groc on December 01, 2017, 07:37:53 PM

Quote from: spartanrules on December 01, 2017, 07:31:21 PM

I really like the idea, since I am an analyst, but unfortunately I do not have enough capital for investing. But how can I protect myself if I provided quality information, but I received either too little reward, or did not receive it at all. Unfortunately our time is pretty much scam Undecided

I understand your fear, but most likely the developers somehow regulate this moment. Without this, the system would not make sense

The content creators have to figure out what resonates with the network to obtain the maximum yield. This is no different than formatting something in the relevant way for an ebay listing, or a craigslist post, if you do it wrong then nobody will pay attention to it.

For some time, we will be subsidizing selected content contributors from our company treasury, as they learn how to provide the best information

Also, do note that people will always be adjusting their rank, so some ranking adjustments may actually be frivolous and unrelated to the quality of the information, yet result in the content contributor being paid

It turns out the rating of authors who provide information, will also be introduced?

probably it will be formed by the users themselves, the process of rewarding for quality information. The more the benefits were provided, the higher one climbed in the leaderboard

I agree with you, thanks to this, all will have confidence in the quality of your information and that means more people will want to receive it from you, accordingly you will receive more rewards for information