Quote from: jspielberg on June 25, 2013, 12:35:28 AM

Quote from: Bitcoinorama on June 24, 2013, 05:18:17 PM

Quote from: koob on June 24, 2013, 05:02:08 PM

Quote from: Bitcoinorama on June 24, 2013, 05:00:35 PM

I certainly think all 3 module purchases, should be bumped upto 4 modules at no extra cost... Wink

What about those who ordered 4 modules then ?

I don't know...whatever seems as proportionately appropriate. Fact is, if bulk chips arrive ahead of batch #3 deliveries, Batch #3 customers have been shafted, which is looking more likely now...

I think Batch 3 customers would love to be thrown a bone. I think the idea of all 3 module purchases getting upgraded to 4 modules is a great idea. It is a solution that doesn't cost Bitsyncom very much (if Hashtech can build them with chip orders for 9BTC, I would guess at most 3BTC per module for Bitsyncom to produce them). This also has the advantage of making the assembly process uniform (just like Batch 1 and 2 were only 3 modules).

If that approach is taken, the obvious solution for 4 module customers is to have their price refunded down to 3 module price (i.e. 76BTC - if purchased with a powersupply) per unit. However... that is a more expensive proposition... as that is real BTC being refunded. Maybe something could be arranged with store credit... though I doubt that will be as popular, but won't be as expense for Bitsyncom.

My guess is that all Batch 3 customers would prefer and be happy with this solution rather than putting in a refund request for the whole amount. This at least I think give batch 3 customers the belief that they have a chance for some level of return on investment.

It is just a good wish of you guys. BitSyncom said nothing about this portion.
I believe all batch#3 customers should think about the worst case.