Quote from: StonerStanley on December 04, 2017, 10:36:46 PM

No you don't understand. You think to understand because of what ? You invested in XSH, someone pumped it, then you think it's a great deal. I made the great deal, i sold all my XSH.

I'm an investor too. An investor isn't someone who is here only for the money, there are different kind of investors. I invested in Darkcoin (Dash) because of the technology, so, i made money beause it was a good technology. I'm investing in techhnology, not in shit coin (i invest in "shit" coin sometime... because there are people like you that think lower supply and "anonymous" in the title are gonna make a great coin. You gonna lose money)

Tor is old and a lot of nodes are under the control of autorities. I won't even talk about Zero-Day vulnerabilities and the number of altcoins that already use tor.

Look SiaCoin total supply and price. Compare it to XSH. You'll understand that techology matter, not just the total supply. There is also the Block reward to take in count.... a lot of things.

IntenseCoin is a nice project.

This has nothing to do with Shield coin.

And I never said Intense Coin was a bad project. I would invest in it, but I am concerned about the total supply of coins making it difficult to get a good ROI.

In posting my thoughts about the total supply of coins, I was hoping that the developers would take my thoughts into consideration (assuming they follow this thread). It wasn't my intention to make it sound like Intense Coin sucks.

It's strange that you got so defensive over what I said. I think you need to relax.