Quote from: The Pharmacist on December 05, 2017, 06:28:33 AM

It's always the noob alt accounts who sling this particular brand of feces. Now, if there was some merit to the claim this dude was making then it'd be irrelevant what rank the dude is--but there is no merit to this accusation. Atriz is a campaign manager, and it's normal for participants to leave positives.

It's pretty much the classic narrative.

Quote from: The Pharmacist on December 05, 2017, 06:28:33 AM

Hell, I left him one because he did an outstanding job on the campaign I was in, and furthermore it shows he can be trusted with money (I don't think there was an escrow, but I could be wrong). This is just another idiotic thread started by some rectally-lesioned, agonized retard who got denied from or booted out of one of aTriz's campaigns.

He can. He doesn't stand to gain anything from this anyways given that he insists that I escrow where possible (via ALU or otherwise).

Quote from: magneto on December 05, 2017, 08:13:23 AM

The email forwarding contract positive trust is probably the only one that is even anywhere close to it. As the trust system is unmoderated though, it is completely up to the discretion of TBZ to give out that trust.

There's always the question of intent. If he bought that contract because he needed it in addition to knowing he'd receive trust for it, is it trust farming? I could even see genuine cases where the contract ends up being unused without malicious intent. Either way, I've suggested TBZ to have a higher criteria when leaving positive trust ratings.