Quote from: usagi on June 26, 2013, 01:17:50 AM

Quote from: RedRobin2442 on June 25, 2013, 10:36:49 PM

[...]

What debts? Like I said, you're new here, hang back a bit and stop embarrassing yourself.

At least take it to PM. What are you, 12?

You should take your own advice.

I've no idea who redrobin is and have never dealt with him at all - nor, by the looks of it have you. Yet you've already:

Accused him of being Ian Bakewell - which you've now backed off from.
Accused him of being AmazingRando (you've now deleted the post in which you did it - as noone quoted it).
What next? Maybe you should accuse him of being Pirate?

Not everyone who disagrees with you is a sock-puppet or second account of a scammer. Some just think you're a lieing piece of shit who doesn't pay his debts. Which seems to me a perfectly valid conclusion to arrive at on the available evidence.

Quote from: usagi on June 24, 2013, 12:01:55 PM

What deprived runs is simply a completely different animal than what I want to run (BMF) and what I do run (TU.SILVER). There's not much point comparing the two.

That's the reason why you won't compare your fund to LTC-ATF - as it's apparently totally different. But then you go ahead and try to compare to LTC-ATF-.B1 (which has a fixed face value) and DMS.MINING (which is explicitly designed so as to return capital over time) - at present apparently only comparing market price and ignoring dividends. No doubt that will change if yours pays out dividends and loses value - if cherry-picking and comparing apples to oranges doesn't work you can always just change how you compare as well.

And of course yours starts off with NAV/U as a base whilst what you compare to starts off with market price - so in any comparison you get the benefit of the (almost inevitable) markup to NAV/U most securities trade at.