Quote from: realr0ach on December 07, 2017, 09:32:55 PM

Why the Anonymint "knowledge age" is a complete fallacy and we will 100% have another dark ages:

[]

Or to put it more simply, when you walk through your house past the various instruments now required by humans in day to day life such as a refrigerator, do you have any idea how to build one yourself from scratch? The answer is no. Well, I'm sure Anonymint is going to lie to me and claim he can build a Kenmore refrigerator from scratch out of various objects he can find on the beach of the Philippines, but that's besides the point. The point is, humans are likely far more specialized than they should be when you have entire towns and cities of huge populations where not a single person can build a computer, refrigerator, or even a steam engine themselves, unlike in the 1700's to early 1900's where people could still build or fix most objects in the house.

Actually with 3D printing yeah soon I will be able to commission a new one by clicking a button and my trusty robot will even do all the work. (3D printing of metal is advancing)

Even if we want mass production, we can save the entire process and design of a factory in a digital file and robots can reconstruct the thing with the press of a button. Starting from 3D printing to build up molds and such.

Until you stop arguing against the inexorable trend to maximum division-of-labor you will forever fail. Because the universal trend to maximum entropy (fundamental Second Law of Thermodynamics) requires the inexorable trend.

Im not trying to chest thump. But really man youre too smart to continue to get this wrong.

Quote from: realr0ach on December 07, 2017, 06:43:58 PM

Quote from: realr0ach on December 07, 2017, 04:48:48 PM

Bitcoin was released right at a time where the bankers knew debt based fiat was going into cascading deflationary collapse since in this fraudulent system debts are considered assets instead of liabilities. This is why the evil Jew sheklers running the system starting spamming the phrase "helicopter money" and "basic income" as an actual serious proposed solution. The system either collapses in deflation, or they print and....it collapses anyway, just a few days later from hyperinflation.

If used as a dollar substitute, bitcoin for all intents and purposes IS helicopter money (bitcoin currently is a dollar derivative and not substitute). So they probably released this bullshit as part of that plan. It's just that the market was completely cornered due to ASIC manufacturers right after it was released, making distribution terrible, rendering the entire exercise pointless and not "helicopter money" anymore since the so called money only goes to a couple people. It appears they continued with their pointless plan anyway and tried to raise the bitcoin price. After this move completely fails to raise money velocity or do anything for the economy, there will be some type of implosion and they will do real helicopter money or basic income into people's bank accounts.

You were doing well on the part about the Zionists creating it on purpose, but you went tinfoil hat retard when you presume they did not anticipate the future effect of ASIC mining. Even Satoshi was anticipating ASICs and centralization. They created Bitcoin because they control it. It is a better reserve currency to replace the dollar, which they can control. It was the efficient way to get a NWO reserve currency without nation-states being able to resist politically.

Quote from: OROBTC on December 07, 2017, 07:46:16 PM

When BTC is over 1.00% of my net, I sell some for gold.

Sorry to be critical but if I could speak factually

Way too conservative even for your age. You should have at least 10% of networth in crypto for it to make a significant impact. W.r.t. to crypto youre effectively just wasting time playing an observer game which has no relevance at all to your life or your mark on this world.

Crypto should be about 90+% of my networth (except for any brief periods of side-stepping massive corrections).

Quote from: OROBTC on December 07, 2017, 07:46:16 PM

I own BTC and precious metals (mostly gold, a fair amount of platinum and tiny amounts of silver & palladium). More $-value of what I hold is in the metals vs. BTC.

Precious metals are an insurance policy (or parking place for capital outside the fiat banking system). They are not for growing your share of the worlds networth (even in fiat collapses it is just a transfer of networth from the sheep to TPTB wolves) so precious metals dont really gain.

Crypto is like the move from the buggy and whip horse carriage to the automobile. If you invested in such a new technology you became a $billionaire.

Quote from: sidhujag on December 07, 2017, 09:43:34 PM

I would say chances of a long term dark age are slim to none..

Yeah technology is diversifying and decentralizing at a breakneck pace!

Only Dark Age I could imagine would be if we somehow made ourselves extinct by meddling in our genome. Our rate of technological+cultural evolution is moving much faster than the species selection process of evolution can anneal, so it is possible we could loose too much information and create a huge accidental extinction (a concept that argues against too much decentralization which @CoinCube had first pointed out to me with a biological model). The paradigm is Transhumanism.

I wonder what is the underlying psychological reason that roach hates technology so much? He seems to associate technology with centralized control? I suppose he thinks if we were still in the Stone Age then the Zionists and banksters would be powerless to control individual humans. But who the heck would want to live in the Stone Age?