Quote from: CrownRoyal79 on December 07, 2017, 07:58:34 PM

Quote from: dottat on December 07, 2017, 07:53:25 PM

Quote from: CrownRoyal79 on December 07, 2017, 07:45:34 PM

Quote from: Spiffy_1 on December 07, 2017, 07:21:36 PM

Wow.. Look at all the mouthly little yips with under 50 posts demanding answers. I can clearly see why you were using nicehash. You have no social interaction skills or common sense. Offer suggestions and realize that someone could be in a different timezone on the other side of the world. Sleep comes to us all, unforseen issues come to us all. If you don't like things leave. If you want to give things a chance, stay and shut up and observe. I've been with this pool for years and as hashrate grew suddenly we had some hickups. This hasn't changed but over time he has expanded to make things smoother. Who sees 4700 BTC disappear suddenly? As for comments mining in the dark? What do you think nicehash was doing? Your hashrate is calculated by the shares you send not your overall hashrate on your side. Completely different system vs nicehash which is PPLS against PPLNS which is zpool. If you don't know what those are I suggest either reading up on it or sit down and enjoy the ride.

You assume an awful lot... I've never used NiceHash, not even once. I switched a couple of my rigs from equihash to lyra2v2. I've tried a couple of different pools in the past 2 days. I like that this pool converts to BTC automatically. However, I would love to know why THIS POOL reports my hashrate at roughly 40% of what my miner reports while a couple other pools report it almost dead-on with what my miner reports. If it's just a reporting problem on the pool side and I'm being paid fairly, then I couldn't care less what gets reported and will keep mining here. But if there is some type of problem and I'm only getting credited for 40% of my hashes then of course I will mine elsewhere.

And since you have more than 50 posts, I'm sure that makes you a bonafide expert on this topic... so please do us all a favor and provide the answer!

Most of these pools really don't know what your miner's true hash rate is. It can only guess the hash rate by looking at the number of submitted shares vs your difficulty. The actual hash rate of your rig doesn't mean squat if its not making valid shares.

100% valid shares according to the Zpool. Suprnova reports hashrate accurately - the reported rate bounces above and below what my miner reports. Zpool consistently shows the hashrate bouncing above and below 40%. All I really care about is whether I'm being compensated fairly.

From past earnings the posted 24 hr avg in mBtc X's the avg hash of two of my d3's (30,000) equalled earnings. This new influx of miners here has changed a number of variables like it has elsewhere and some of the previous stable reporting indicators are off. Earnings though still seem to be roughly the same perhaps a little lower due to the increased difficulty because of the higher pool hash rate.

Hopefully the dust settles and folks adjust to the new normal soon. I would imagine this wasn't anything anyone at this pool or any other pool could have dreamed happening so it's catching everyone off guard. Imagine the idled hardware at nicehash right now.