Quote from: Fermin AK on December 08, 2017, 11:02:38 AM

Quote from: matjas on December 08, 2017, 10:06:11 AM

Quote from: the_donald on December 08, 2017, 05:53:02 AM

Quote from: cmg12 on December 07, 2017, 11:31:14 PM

Quote from: lobat999 on December 07, 2017, 11:19:58 PM

Quote from: Rigorous on December 07, 2017, 10:28:17 PM

Quote from: greatteager on December 07, 2017, 10:20:02 PM

Quote from: TSokol on December 07, 2017, 10:05:06 PM

Hello! I am an editor from icoholder.com. Your ICO was added to our listing and now is available to investors: https://icoholder.com/en/ico/modultrade-3971. If you want to fill out your profile with more information, want to add, change something - feel free to contact me

Rating 4.19, a good indicator, the project is waiting for success in the future.

That score is broken down into

ICO Profile 4.44
Vision 4.5
Activity 2.8
Potential 4.45
Product 4.5
Team 3.42

Very specific numbers, even with 2 decimals precision. I wonder how those numbers are determined.

I'm more concerned about the activity criteria for the fact that ModulTrade already has a running and live platform and yet they scored it only at 2.8? It should have been higher than 4.5 imho.

These scores are usually irrelevant because people who review ICOs doesn't have enough knowledge to make a fair verdict

you shouldn't take these scores to serious. sometime's these scores are bought and paid for.

I totally agree. It's nothing but another subjective opinion. The number of course looks very nice, but you should't take in too seriously.Always do your own research.

The more reviews are talking good things about the project the better but you should always think for yourself. Even the better experts can be wrong.

It could also be the opposites