Quote from: maeusi on December 10, 2017, 11:25:22 PM

Could you check this post ? (and that is not on bounty)
---snip---

This group appeared in the results as well, and was one of the larger groups I had first come across. I needed more proof though besides the wallet sharing so there is additional evidence I would need with this group to leave feedback as DT (based on my own criteria), which I just have not had time to do Undecided

, but if this is all the evidence that SMAS needs, I may just add the accounts I'm finding on there to get them off of the campaigns that follow SMAS, but my main goal is to find enough evidence to leave feedback and hopefully shut them down from all campaigns.

Quote from: Quickseller on December 11, 2017, 12:13:34 AM

--snip--
I would also like to say that I would be strongly suspicious of any campaign ever managed by Lauda, although a few accounts that I suspect to be his sockpuppets generally do not participate in his campaigns.

Thank you for the links and explanation! As for Lauda, what is the reason to be suspicious? I assume there is a theory here... I can imagine a few but I haven't seen evidence of anything at this point with any campaigns being run by Lauda. I'm all ears Grin

Quote from: The Pharmacist on December 10, 2017, 10:42:00 PM

Quote from: dillpicklechips on December 10, 2017, 04:11:24 PM

Well... It is not that hard to find one. The most abused signature campaigns are those in Bounty section. Why not try that? You may find multiple accounts enrolled in the same campaign which is against the rules. Those signature campaigns who pay in BTC have strict managers having high standards which farmed accounts don't have.

That is absolutely the worst section on bitcointalk, and though I have no data, I agree with you--just from glancing at what's posted there. Most applicants are noobs, and there are many, many of them. The probability of all these noobs NOT being alt accounts and NOT abusing those bounties has got to be infinitesimal. That script sounds very interesting, though I won't claim to understand how you do what you do.

I would be very interested to see what the results are. I do think that the campaigns that are in the Services section--the ones which pay in bitcoin--are pretty well-run and have fewer abusers (though they're certainly not free of shitposters). Good luck on your project, dude.

Thank you both, I'll look a little closer at that section.