Quote from: Kennedy on December 12, 2017, 08:18:07 AM

Quote from: ub27 on December 12, 2017, 08:01:47 AM

Quote from: oaks05 on December 12, 2017, 06:23:32 AM

Quote from: mrlee611 on December 12, 2017, 05:21:29 AM

Quote from: oaks05 on December 12, 2017, 04:11:40 AM

Quote from: 12inchMom on December 12, 2017, 03:18:48 AM

Quote from: oaks05 on December 12, 2017, 02:53:21 AM

Hey mr bold letters calm down, the fact trex hasnt listed mgo is because of the SEC ruling on listing securties, the erc23 is no longer a issue, the fact that mgo has a buyback and burn with mgo makes it look like a security( even though the team thinks differently) so trex hasnt listed but still has not said if they plan on listing or not. Obviously we all would love to see it on bigger exchanges but the US exchanges are not listing coins like mgo for the time being, so binance is the exchange we are hoping on for right now and the team has been in contact with binance.

We all know that the sec rule was just implemented. MGO ICO ended when? that pretty much answers that question.

As for the Binance situation. How long have we been getting the same response that they are in contact with Binance? seriously someone with the time and wants to investigate should go back and peruse earlier post and get the specific date when we got that first response. One thing i know is it's been several months, however, Enjin just finished their ICO a month ago, collected way less fund (and i mean way way less funding) and its already on binance.

I know according to you guys am a fudder. But i rather be a fudder than a mindless sheep. It's our job to hold this team accountable. Either way they are good, their funding has quintupled and still rising, our investment is regressing back to the womb in a bullish market. You can either just keep yelling fudder and repeating the same comments/wishes i have seen so many times in the past several months or actually be real to yourself and hold the team accountable/ask for some real responses

man you have no clue what the facts are, in the beginning the issue was the fact trex wasnt erc223 compatible by the time they were compatible the SEC ruling came into effect. once again you keep making yourself look stupid by pretending to know the facts when you clearly dont. that is why it is in deed called FUD.

Wake up man. He is not fking FUD. After failed at Bittrex, the Dev has a big time to list on Binance (which many coins are listed recently). They got alot of money from ICO but they dont fucking pay some money to list to Binance. One more thing, Look at GAME that already in Polo, Bittrex but small volume. Not much people intersted in buying Game so this company is losing faith from investors.

jack has said a few times now they are willing to pay binance to list mgo, but at this time it is up to binance to accept and list it, once again information you would already have if you took two seconds to go and read, so ONCE AGAIN more FUD by saying dev is unwilling to pay binance listing fee geeze people are relentless and clueless.

Bullshit! You have to understand and its a fact: much more smaller ICO's/tokens already listed on Binance!

Im 100% agree with Mr Bold, nothing happened in the last few month except the Unity partnership which i dont give a f**k. We receive bullshit mailchimp newsletters but thats all! Im a big bagholder but now i think we already lost our money...

really sad ,so what's should we do ,can our community help ourself to hit Binance in future ?

Burning tokens has nothing to do with security. A security token is something that is used beignr a share of company or if that money is used for an investment etc...
MGO is a share in a company. Thats why its a security. It wont be listed on polo or trex. But why its not listed on Binance its beyond me... But hey people are still buying the MGOs so in their view everything is fine... When people will stop buying the tokens then maybe they will realize the problem.