Quote from: TECHICENINE on June 30, 2013, 07:01:37 PM

Quote from: Rannasha on June 30, 2013, 06:54:09 PM

Quote from: TECHICENINE on June 30, 2013, 06:30:28 PM

Quote from: furuknap on June 30, 2013, 06:24:41 PM

Quote from: The_Jacobson on June 27, 2013, 08:40:26 AM

I think the problem is that with a fully refundable fee is that people will create bad securities and spam the system. But now there is no incentive for moderators to vote in a timely fashion so burnside is trying to make an incentive for them to do so (50% refund).

...and then they would just vote whatever to get the additional money. In other words, assets are now approved to give LTC Global voters more money. Would you say No or Abstain to an asset, knowing that it cost you personally to do so?

The only system I can think of that makes sense is the way voting is done in 'normal' elections; set a date, tally votes, the side that gets the most votes win.

.b

why even have votes for BTC "toxic securities" what part of "open source" do you not understand..thanks

There is nothing "open source" about BTCT. Not sure where you get that idea from.

Bitcoin open source so we r in a very dynamic market here/\ASICSOLAR\/+shares going live soon..thanks

Somehow the ignore button is very shiny on you.