Quote from: rb1205 on July 01, 2013, 06:20:17 AM

If that's the point I don't think that public messages should be given equal priority time wise, mainly because everyone can check a public message timestamp while a PM is, well, private. To me PMs are a way to setup private details, but since the selling thread was public I expect the offers to be public as well, or at least not to expect PMs to be treated like post replies.

furthermore, I already gave full verifiable proof of my ownership in the first post, so your initial request for direct verification by friedcat was somewhat redundant. I can't take your initial offer as an actual one.

After closing my deal with mechs, given the huge increase in price of AM shares, I'm going to close this thread and start a new one with an updated price.

if u close your shares to me and reedlaw, There is a serious unfairness.

rb1205, as a hero number, must obey the following ruler:

(1)first come, first get
(2)honesty

If rb1205 refuse the top two rulers， It means what he said is nonsense. I will keep watch on his id (rb1205), his shares address and dividend. And I will launch a post in Chinese board to discuss the fairness in auctions. his id will be reported.

When rb1205 launch his 20 acisminer shares auction , the price of acisminer shares is about 3.5 BTC. Price change will not be the reason to cancel this auction.

confirming shares by friedcat is preconditions. rb1205 can not tell us the shares-confirming is the main reason to refuse me and reedlaw.
English is not my mother tongue. I will report and discuss this post with friedcat in Chinese.

innovation