is this a final decission from CMC or what could we do, that this will be changed ?
It's clear that the cmc circulating supply is a battle of interpretation between the two parties. Go under the FAQ of the cmc site, and look for this question "
Why is the Circulating Supply used in determining the market capitalization instead of Total Supply? "
CMC uses the public float to determine the market cap. It's clear that they see the November 2nd virtual fork free coins that have not yet been redeemed as locked coins. Therefore, according to their definition of market cap these non-redeemed coins are not accounted for the circulating supply.
Is it fair compared to all BTC forks? Absolutely not!
It's not a interpretation at all, its just wrong. If you left your purse at you grandparents place which you visit just once a year, or maybe never again, that money is still circulating and in public float, does not matter if you have access to it or not. It's there!
Same with the virtual fork, at the time of importing the BTC snapshot the devs made these coins public float.
Different point of view, how could anybody check how much coin are redeemed and how much not? So they will never be in circulation?
If there was no different point-of-view, cmc would already show the correct circulation. But since they're not, obviously both parties don't see the circulating supply the same way! You can put your troll mask and spam all around you that they are just a bunch of f** sh**, or you can try to understand their point-of-view and why it's different from our point-of-view.
Do a bit of research, do your homework and you'll find an answer to all your questions.
Thank you for that profound advice. All I try to say is that their "point of view" means in the end, the distribution via BTC snapshot import will never count toward the market cap. And this, I think is just wrong. And because of that I allow myself not to call that "point of view". Maybe I'am to harsh with my wording, but I never troll around.
At the moment we can change nothing so ... let's ignore this, or what is you suggestion?
I see CMC is one of the most referred/viewed website (even at the bitcore.cc site [bottom]) for investors looking at market caps, volume and change.
So I think it's important to make clear statements what is right and what is wrong.