Quote from: jasux on December 14, 2017, 12:33:02 PM

Quote from: mrhans on December 14, 2017, 11:26:39 AM

Quote from: jasux on December 14, 2017, 11:12:37 AM

Ok here an explanation. at first the decision for a coin swap was made because it was easier for the coding. After the coinswap there are two differenct coins.
Tradecoin with POW, and Tradecoin with MN but both coins are running on a different chain. the new MN trade need to be relisted to an exchange. mark will pay for that new exchange. (not sure what exchange, don't expect cryptopia because thats 30k listing)
there is no need to worry just chill and wait.

You're avoiding my question. I've understood that there will be a coins swap and I don't mind. What I do mind is that Trade and Score will not merge, there will still be two separate coins that both don't have even a single usecase. So why not merge them and have one stronger coins than two weak ones

If that is your question. there is a simple answer. Tradecoin and Scorecoin are two completly different coins. there isn't a way to merge this two coins to one coin.
What you want is the same as merging bitcoin and Digibyte... both have sha256 but total different coins. score and trade are from the same dev but are completly different.

Yeah they can not be merged like Score with pow and score with master nodes hence the coin swap... If this simple question can't be answered I think all hope is lost then. But that was to be expected