Hey "investments specialist" cmon, how can you not know that in cases like this operators ask for KYC not for fun but because they are legally obligated to do so?? Every government that issues gambling licenses has some kind of AML/KYC procedure & regulation integrated in the license when amounts go over specific thresholds or there is reason to suspect fraudulent behaviour (again, in our example not being able to response from registered email and accessing the casino from different device/id would looks suspicious right?)
http://www.igamingbusiness.com/directory/curacao-e-gaminghttps://www.trulioo.com/blog/bitcoin-regulation/1) If they are legally obligated to ask for KYC, then they are also legally obligated when the deposit reaches a certain amount!
Why do BitCasino habitually breach this legally obligation? Because there is none?
2) Please show us BitCasino's license issued by the Government of Curacao?
3) Where are the regulations stated BitCasino has to follow?
TwitchySeal already asked, but the
BitCasino scam is not able to show it! Hence, they follow fantasy regulations to defraud the customers.
players are obviously well within their rights to go to our regulator if they prefer.
Cheers,
Bitcasino.io
Is there any record of a player going to your regulator (curacao) and getting any sort of decision...or even response? (not just for your site, for any site they license)
Is there any public record of the actual regulations you have agreed to follow? Are there any that are put in place to protect players?
From what I can tell, Curacao basically requires a fee to be paid in exchange for a "license" - which allows you to open a bank account. I've never heard of them even once step in to protect a player. I have seen casinos use the excuse "we have to keep your money/see your ID because of our regulators..." plenty of times though. (Obv I don't buy it)