Quote from: qubalaya on December 14, 2017, 11:27:24 PM

Quote from: R-J-F on December 14, 2017, 10:55:56 PM

Quote from: qubalaya on December 14, 2017, 08:27:30 AM

Quote from: extremeprogrammer on December 13, 2017, 06:16:41 AM

Quote from: osprey170 on December 12, 2017, 08:23:22 PM

Quote from: CSI123 on December 12, 2017, 07:22:34 PM

Interesting fact: Mileva Maric-Einstein (Einstein's first wife) was born on 19. December.

Maybe it's a hint, don't know. Wink

There was some debate whether or not Mileva collaborated with Einstein on some of his most important work. Is it a hint? I don't know but my personal take on Dec. 19th is that they will announce a collaboration with some other organization. NASA, SpaceX, some other scientific or corporate organization? Who knows it's all speculation right now but if it isn't as mind blowing as it's been made out to be then EMC will certainly see a huge correction. Regardless I still believe in the project long term...

Yes. Maybe this article also gives a hint about NASA partnership https://futurism.com/elon-musk-is-not-smiling-over-trumps-19-5-nasa-budget/

With all due respect, the aforementioned article doesn't contain any references to cryptocurrencies or blockchain.
How is this less speculative than pulling out any of the top 10 results from a Google search on "science and engineering"?
Posts like this undermine the credibility of the coin and strongly suggest scam! And this is coming from a person who was genuinely intrigued about the "intended" ambitions and goals (as scarcely represented online) of this project.

Scam? LOL, go back and read the last three years of history in this forum before you start making yourself look the fool.

My apologies - my intention definitely hasn't been to begin a verbal fight on a personal basis or otherwise. And I don't appreciate your suggestion about who might look like whatever.
The bottom line was - drawing completely arbitrary and imaginary connections doesn't hold up to the promises of the project, and doesn't bring any positive points to its perceived quality. Any other relatively intelligent person out there would infer more or less the same. The best we've got so far from the project is the laconic "wait till date X. big announcement coming" ...
I don't think having done a course on the history of EMC2 is a pre-requisite to realizing that things are not going okay. Github metrics and developer interaction is what I trust.

Well, I thought that was quite obvious, tho it might just been me, didn't think anyone took made up connections seriously.