Quote from: Fuzzyma on December 15, 2017, 01:41:29 PM

How did you discover the order in which you read the sides?

I grouped just the lengths by six each on a single line and the pattern pops out:

0 1 1 0 1 1
0 1 1 0 1 0
0 0 1 0 1 1
0 1 1 0 1 1
0 0 1 1 1 1
0 1 1 1 1 1
0 1 1 0 1 1
0 1 1 1 1 1
0 0 1 0 1 0
0 0 1 1 1 0
0 0 1 0 1 1
0 1 1 1 1 1
0 1 1 1 1 1
0 1 1 1 1 1
0 0 1 1 1 0
0 1 1 0 1 1
0 1 1 0 1 1
0 1 1 0 1 0
0 0 1 0 1 1
0 1 1 1 1 1
0 0 1 0 1 1
0 0 1 1 1 0
0 1 1 0 1 1
0 0 1 0 1 0
0 0 1 1 1 1
0 0

Quote from: Fuzzyma on December 15, 2017, 01:41:29 PM

PS: As a checksum: I counted 150 flames. Does this match with your findings alphabetacanary?
We might want to abstract the whole image, having only flames, length and color in the image so we dont start deciding if something is a flame or not over and over again

No, I count 152 flames in total. If you look at my post #518, I provided the dataset I am working with. That probably accounts for the disruption of the pattern in your dataset. I went over my numbers four times and they always check out for me.